Tag: protagonist

  • Choosing an Enneatype for Your Protagonist

    If you’ve been reading about the types and just can’t decide which one is right, or even if you’ve never given the Enneagram a thought, these starting points might help you narrow in on what’s most important in your story and what type protagonist would be best to explore it. Every story needs a strong Central Conflict, where the External and Internal Conflicts are inseparably linked.

    Not all of these methods will spark the right ideas, they might not all even fit in retrospect once you have selected a type and developed the story, but all of them can be used as a place to start digging and discover what enneatype might be the best fit for the protagonist of your story.

    By First Impression and Visualization

    If you saw a character before you saw a story, this might be a great place to start. Try thinking about how you imagine this character and what makes you picture him this way. Even if you’ve had trouble selecting a type by overall descriptions, give this a try anyway. Forget about whatever has made you conflicted over your choice of type and instead picture your character. Nevermind appearances, focus on behavior. How does he act around his friends? How does he act around strangers? Whether she’s sure of herself or not, is she quick or slow to action?

    These, I think, are the most prominent characteristics of each of the types. Try out whichever one jumps out at you and see if that type fits the story according to the other methods.

    One knows their way of thinking is the best and wonders why others don’t hold themselves to the same high standards.

    Two never thinks of self and can’t stand to be idle, so is always busy doing for others.

    Three is charming with people, thrives on work and knows how to get things accomplished.

    Four is imaginative, deeply moved by emotion, embraces and is troubled by the idea that they are unlike anyone else.

    Five is most happy existing in the mind and feels drained by the need to go out among people and away from familiar comforts.

    Six is highly risk-conscious, full of doubts, but is eager to prove themselves and their loyalty.

    Seven is full of passion for life and new experiences and is often blinded to the wants of others by their enthusiasm in the pursuit of their own dreams.

    Eight is never intimidated by others and is relentless in maintaining control over their own situation and possessions.

    Nine enjoys peacefulness and togetherness but will hide or flee from turmoil around them to seek solitude if quiet can be found in no other way.

    These descriptions are deliberately superficial for the sake of clarity. Soon I will be adding links to deeper analysis of fictional characters of that type and what evidence from their stories I used to come to that conclusion. If you still are torn between two or three types, try these methods of narrowing down your choice.

    • Check to see their relationships to each other on the Enneagram. You may be picturing your character at their stress or security point at some times and at their base type at others.
    • See which types are notoriously mistyped as which other types and what important differences can be used to distinguish them. (Mistyping at first is not a bad thing and can actually help to figure out how your character might be lying to himself by how he sees himself compared to how he really is.)
    • Pay attention to the situations in which you are picturing this character. Is this a proactive or reactive moment? Look at the Hornevian and Harmonic groups to decide which type would behave in this way at different times.
    • Take a look at the selection methods below, keeping in mind the types you’ve considered

    By Premise or Plot

    These are the most prominent elements of any story and so perhaps the most important when it comes to what sort of protagonist takes the stage. Premise and plot are different things, but for this purpose we can think of them as nearly the same. Both have to do with the situation and actions in the story that directly effect your protagonist. A premise can be explored through any enneatype, but depending on which one you pick, the plot will likely be different. Certain plots will be most effective with particular types of protagonists because those events would be most likely to fuel internal conflict in that type.

    Ask yourself these questions. What sort of world do they live in? What sort of life do they lead? What are they forced to do or prevented from doing? What is it in the external conflict that pulls and tears at the protagonist’s internal conflict? Another way to think of it, what situation is the protagonist in that stirs up unbearable and irreconcilable inner conflict?

    Which of the following generic premises describes the most prominent way in which the external conflict effects your protagonist?

    One is at risk of becoming corrupted, has accidentally done wrong, or been the cause of evil.

    Two cares deeply about others but has no appreciation or love.

    Three‘s hard earned accomplishments have been destroyed or become meaningless.

    Four has been misunderstood and can’t be sure what is wrong with or missing from their own life.

    Five has been compelled, in a way they themselves can hardly explain, to enter a conflict they may be unprepared to cope with.

    Six has had to leave a place of security and must learn to trust their own judgement.

    Seven has been denied their dreams and is forced to struggle and endure pain, unable to appreciate comforts in life.

    Eight has little to no control over their own situation or future.

    Nine will never have peace while a conflict remains unaddressed.

    As you can see, these definitions by premise and plot are directly linked to the Fear of each type. Whatever the external conflict has to offer must be the worst thing the protagonist can imagine in order for there to be a strong internal conflict and as effective a story as possible. Whatever methods the protagonist has been using to manage conflicts before the story starts will prove to be ineffective against the antagonist. For each type, this brings about a universal fear of Loss of Identity. If being who they’ve been all their lives can no longer save them from their fears, who must they become to survive? Must they either loose who they are or perish? To each type these two seem one in the same, and in order to survive they must learn that they are not their identity. In this way, the consequences of this conflict are either death or liberation. It can be their demise or their salvation depending on their choices.

    Each of the above premises might be something any type might avoid, and certainly their own unique fears could have been explored through them, but in each case, only one type is directly threatened by loss of their identity. Questioning who we are is the most terrifying and difficult thing to answer, but one your protagonist must grapple with at the root of their internal conflict.

    By Starting State

    Establishing the protagonist’s starting state is one of the most important elements to setting the stakes in any story. Luckily, this is also the part of the story that most writers can picture long before they put down the opening sentence. I’ve noticed these clear patterns by type in many of the stories I’ve looked at so far. A character starts out a certain way, until a key event pushes them into the conflict and they take the role of protagonist. See which one of these sounds most like the start of your story. (Keep in mind these might not fit some character arcs unless you take backstory into account.)

    One knows exactly what to do and doesn’t hesitate to act, but this world falls apart when they realize something has gone terribly wrong.

    Two is on a mission to help others but is met with rejection and no appreciation for their service.

    Three is confident and successful, everything in life is looking up, until all they’ve worked for is suddenly at risk.

    Four is missing something, but has no idea what that something could be. They feel misunderstood until they encounter something new that might be the answer to filling the emptiness.

    Five is content to live in the isolated life they’ve created for themselves, until something happens that draws them out and compels them to action.

    Six has either never been a risk taker, or has always taken risk in spite of themselves, but now in a rash moment has bitten off more than they can chew and must rely on their own judgement to navigate the consequences.

    Seven knows exactly what they want and how to get it. They’ve got big dreams, but they encounter their first hurdle of internal conflict when these dreams are denied.

    Eight has their life mostly under control until a new threat arises that may be too big even for them to handle.

    Nine has managed to avoid conflict all their life, but now is forced into the arena with the knowledge that only they can bring about peace.

    By Security Point

    What would do this character the most good? You can use the security point to find the base type that might suit your character best. Think about your character’s ruts. What type would do them the most good in avoiding the usual pitfalls of their way of thinking? This usually will involve some form of “relax and let go of your fears”.

    One would do well to let go of obsession with perfection and enjoy life like a Seven.

    Two would do well to let go of the need to be needed by others and focus on self like a Four.

    Three would do well to let go of competitiveness and become cooperative like a Six.

    Four would do well to rise out of the depths of painful emotions and strive for self betterment like a One.

    Five would do well to come out of hiding and address conflicts like an Eight.

    Six would do well to quiet the worrying mind and achieve inner peace like a Nine.

    Seven would do well to quit running towards excitement and look inside like a Five.

    Eight would do well to let down walls of protection and become open and generous like a Two.

    Nine would do well to embrace what they want, even if it means rippling waters, and pursue it like a Three.

    Be careful not to confuse what would be good for this character with what their friends might think would be good for them. This direction is often the type’s Stress point. Friends of a Five might say, “You should go out to a party, let your hair down, be more like a Seven!” but if that Five actually behaved this way, it would not be self-betterment, it would be a crisis, a cry for help. Not that the good points of a Seven would be bad for a Five, but emulating Seveness is a self-destructive shortcut, all too easy to fall into, and the Five will face self-loathing for going there. It may actually entrench the Five’s usual way of being and become an obstacle to achieving Eightness, the true path of growth for the Five.

    Some have the idea that both Stress and Security points can be expressed in positive and negative ways. They then call them Connecting Points and while I do agree that both can be used both ways under certain circumstances, I still think there are clear distinctions between them.

    By Stress Point

    What would be their downfall? What behaviors would signal a downward spiral? This would be a miserable time for your protagonist, a time of self loathing or denial. These methods of acting out can also be used to let off pent up stress, or as an alternative course of action to obtain their goals, but even though they might sometimes be effective, they are never actually healthy.

    One can’t hold it up anymore and feels isolated by unique suffering and may even give in to these emotions like a Four

    Two is frustrated by constant sacrifice being taken for granted or even going unnoticed by others and becomes controlling and confrontational like an Eight.

    Three struggles with failures and wonders what’s the purpose of their goals in life and becomes unambitious and complacent like a Nine.

    Four feels threatened by rejection and becomes clingy and willing to sacrifice like a Two.

    Five has withdrawn as much as possible but still feels invaded and turns to diversions to avoid inner pain like a Seven.

    Six sees their imagined fears becoming reality and finally jumps into action to address them like a Three.

    Seven is unhappy and goes deeper into denial, avoiding unpleasant emotions by becoming focused and dedicated to work like a One.

    Eight has created more enemies for themselves than they can take on and retreats, becoming reclusive like a Five

    Nine can no longer maintain inner and outer tranquility and becomes aware of dangers and worried like a Six.

    Whatever method you use to find the type that will have the most impact in your story, remember that almost any type can find conflict in any premise. Some may need additional motives to confront the conflict in the case of Withdrawn or Compliant types, or to find themselves in a dilemma in the face of conflict with the Assertive types.

    Don’t be afraid to explore the possibilities of types that didn’t immediately seem obvious. You might be surprised what you find!

  • Developing The Protagonist-Antagonist Relationship

    Every story’s plot comes down to the relationship between the protagonist and the antagonist. These two characters make the story, so whatever is tying them together in conflict has to be strong for both of them. The two must be marked by each other in some way. Even before the protagonist takes any action against the antagonist, no other character involved in the conflict could possibly take the lead role. He has already been singled out. The same goes for the antagonist. No other force could possibly undo the protagonist in the same way as the antagonist can.

    Don’t leave this task to the external conflict alone. Logical reasons explaining why each character can’t turn away are vital. However, the plot can only be emotional if something in the internal conflict compels them to battle. The best way to do this is to give both characters something in common.

    Already, your protagonist and antagonist probably have one thing in common. They must be in conflict over the Want, or there is no story. Either they are both after the same thing, or one wants something that the other cannot allow. Even so, the relationship can never be more than Hero vs Villain unless they share more points of internal conflict. The protagonist and antagonist must be tailored to suit each other. This will make each of them the particular opponent for the other, each the only one that is truly dangerous to the other.

    Shared Points of Internal Conflict

    There is nothing more deeply disturbing to the protagonist than to recognize something of the enemy in himself. Not only does he then questions his motives and actions, but a possible “wrong path” comes to light showing what he could become.

    Explore these possible connections between protagonist and antagonist through the points of the Internal Conflict Triangle.

    Wound

    Shared traumatic backstory is the strongest tie between protagonist and antagonist. Voldemort killed Harry’s parents. The Emperor turned Luke’s father into Darth Vader. Katniss’s father was killed because of the way of life inflicted by President Snow. Most Man Vs. Nature stories start out with a prologue showing the protagonist loosing a loved one to the type of natural disaster they become obsessed with. Every time the protagonist faces the antagonist, not only is there the threat of physical danger, but the reopening this past Wound.

    Fear

    Before the protagonist realizes the weakness of his own Fear, it is often discovered and exploited first by the antagonist. It takes the protagonist longer yet to discover the same weakness in the antagonist, and having the same fear himself can make it harder for him to use it.

    Don’t forget that the antagonist has an internal conflict as well. Understanding it is the best way, for your protagonist and for you as the writer, to find out his weaknesses.

    Lie

    A protagonist that shares a Lie with the antagonist is in greatest danger of going down the wrong path. He will be his own worst enemy, and unless he recognizes this Lie for what it is, he can never have a happy ending. The antagonist may be the one to bring this shared Lie to light, using it to shake up the protagonist in telling him that they are not so unalike as he would like to think. This sort of event can easily lead to the Midpoint and a “mirror moment” (as taught by James Scott Bell) where the protagonist reevaluates where he stands in his internal conflict.

    Flaw

    The protagonist may be most blind to this kind of similarity with the antagonist, though it will likely be what he hates the most about him. It might take the intervention of another character, a friend or mentor, to make him see this. (Well suited to the “ally attacks” plot point employed by Libby Hawker.)

    Want

    As I’ve mentioned above, this connection will always be present as it is the strongest link between the internal and external conflicts. Why the characters are after this goal is explained mostly by the Wound and Fear points of internal conflict, the Motivation corner of the Triangle.

    Need

    The antagonist is potentially the best teacher for the protagonist if they share this connection. By learning about the antagonist, he can learn about himself and see what’s really important and what he needs to do to overcome the same obstacles that were the downfall of the antagonist. At the same time, struggling through his own internal conflict may shed light on solutions in the external conflict in how to best defeat the antagonist.

    Bring in the External Conflict

    The protagonist’s inner journey is triggered by the introduction of the antagonist and the external conflict. The struggles of overcoming both of these conflicts, the places where they intersect, will form the central conflict. Each time the stakes are raised, there will be an additional push of stress on both. The protagonist’s usual way of dealing with problems won’t work against the antagonist. These methods were probably effective in the past, which is why they became entrenched, but when faced with the antagonist, they become a vulnerability. Only through the inner journey can they be reformed and brought to the external conflict as a strength.

    The antagonist is not just the story’s bad guy, he is the protagonist’s bad guy. If the antagonist does not strike a nerve in the protagonist, they are not well matched and there is no central conflict. This is why an antagonist must suit the protagonist; just any scary villain won’t do. Their connection must be personal. This will make the effects of the protagonist’s Wound deadly. He must reopen and heal his Wound if he is to survive the conflict with the antagonist, but at the same time, perhaps nothing less could have brought him to do this.

    However you choose to develop your characters, they have to fit your story and they have to fit together. No two characters are more important in this way than the protagonist and the antagonist. These two characters are more alike than you think, certainly more alike than they would care to admit.

  • Crafting Your Protagonist’s Internal Conflict

    Internal conflict is the most important part of any story and it is often the most easily overlooked by beginning writers. External conflict is easy to brainstorm, easy to see and most premises (except for literary fiction) revolve around the external conflict rather than the internal conflict. When you hear the advice, “story is all about the characters” this is what it’s talking about. There has to be internal conflict, or the story lacks meaning and it doesn’t impact the reader.

    The Internal Conflict Triangle

    All writers have heard the term “character sketch” but rarely have I heard anyone talk about “character structure”. Character’s wants, needs, strengths and weaknesses are all familiar enough, but they don’t imply any intrinsic structure on their own. How do these pieces come together to form a character?

    Two books I read really brought the skeleton of my first Internal Conflict Triangle together. The first one was Take Your Pants Off by Libby Hawker (no need for offense! This is a pun referring to writers who are pantsers rather than plotters) and Writing the Heart of Your Story by C.S. Lakin.

    Libby Hawker talks about basing a character on a Flaw, one that will need to be addressed if the character is to grow and solve the conflict. This hurdle creates the character arc of journeying from the “flawed” state into the “true self”, which is all about the Need to learn a lesson. C.S. Lakin talks about a character suffering a Wound which causes a Fear and the belief in a Lie which become obstacles to achieving a core Need. The Need and Fear are linked. Fear is that Need won’t be realized and Need is to overcome Fear. She also talks about the character’s journey from “persona” to “true essence” (which is the way to look at character arc from the point of view of the Enneagram as well).

    So at this point, we have these two templates:

    • A Flaw gives rise to a character’s Need to overcome that Flaw and achieve a better self.
    • A Wound causes a Fear that Need will not be met and a belief in a Lie that Need cannot be met

    Each of these formalize what makes up the inside of a character, but I thought each method was not quite as universal as it could be. Then I realized the two could be very easily combined to make an even more complete picture. These points were all just different ways of looking at the same roots of character and in every character, all of them are present to some extent.

    Wound

    This is the true start of your character’s story. If the antagonist’s actions are the Inciting Incident of the External Conflict (or Plot), then so the Wound is for the Internal Conflict. This event may happen at the beginning of your narrative, but more than likely it’s in the backstory and the audience will have to learn of it in bits and pieces. Or it could be shown through a prologue as often happens in movies where we are shown the protagonist surviving some traumatic event which explains their unique motivation throughout the story.

    It’s worth considering which came first: the Wound or the Fear? Could definitely be a bit of both, but I would argue that at the very root, Fear has to come first. Two characters could share the exact same backstory but, because of their own unique Fears, come away from it with different Wounds. Each of them would have been wounded wherever the event hit their Fear. Fear is the weakness, and without it the character would have been immune to such Wounds. The “weapon” that caused the Wound isn’t so important as how the character has taken the injury and let it scar over.

    Depending on the severity of the Wound, the Fear will be even more deeply entrenched. It’s ironic, considering the Fear was the weakness that allowed the Wound to happen in the first place. Think of this law of physics: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The character’s Fear will become more “irrational” and motivating depending on how severely the Wound event evoked this Fear. This force will carry on even further into the expression of the Flaw.

    Don’t get the idea that every character must have survived some spectacular trauma. The Wound event could have been something that no one else even noticed but meant a great deal to the character. Or even something that can’t be defined by a single event, like an upbringing. If this is the case, there should still be some specific moment for the character that can be used to represent this past as a whole

    Fear

    Even though the story starts out with the Wound, the character started with the Fear. Very early on in life, the character felt something lacking inside which led to a Fear that the true self did not possess inner strength in this area. Since this hole could not be filled, it was quickly covered over with a protective mask of persona.

    The character’s Driving Force is a two-sided coin with Want on one side and Fear on the other. Fear is much more powerful and provides the negative Motivation as opposed to the somewhat weaker positive Incentive of the Want. At the beginning of your story, your character will probably be more aware of their Want than their Fear, but each time the stakes are raised, they’ll find themselves running from their Fear much more than running towards their Want.

    It’s important that the Fear be unique to this character (with the possible exception of the antagonist), even if it is something that anyone might try to avoid, to this character it may as well be a matter of life and death. That sort of Fear always revolves around some form of “death”, as James Scott Bell has said, either physical, professional or psychological death. Fear of real death is understandable, but what about the other two? It comes down to a Death of Identity. Whatever the character has been before the story started is at stake but also must change in order for the character to survive. This creates the conflict: The character must face the Death of Identity they Fear in order to survive and achieve their Need.

    As I mentioned above, the Fear unique to your character will essentially act like an “irrational” fear. The idea of this thing happening is so unthinkable that the character will be in danger of responding completely irrationally in order to avoid it. This leads to the very common horror of characters, through their own Flaw which was developed as a defensive mechanism, causing their own Fear to become a reality. Realizing this contradiction is nearly unbearable in any internal conflict and is the make or break point in the character arc.

    Lie

    Many parts of the Triangle come into play here. The Lie is the justification of the Flaw, the belief that Fear is worth avoiding at all costs, that Wound cannot be healed or lived with or that Want will solve all problems. This self-message can make it easier to pursue Want as an excuse for avoiding Need. The character may tell themselves they’re not happy about having this Flaw, but for the moment they have no choice! Once they’ve achieved their Want, then they can let go of Flaw because they will be protected from their Fear. Depending on the story you’re writing, the specific Lie may take many of these forms or it might take just one.

    Psychologically, Lies are not only believed because of past “evidence” from the Wound to support them, but because they subconsciously provide an excuse to avoid the real problem. Solving life problems requires painful self-examination, forgiveness and sacrifice. It’s hard. But believing the Lie does not really make life easier, it comes with a price. “It’s not your fault, it’s their fault” is a Lie that allows you to deny you can solve the problem and therefore absolves you of responsibility, but it also leaves you hopeless. This is the part that’s self-destructive. If there’s nothing you can do, you’re trapped to live out your life this way. This creates inner turmoil and the irrational response to Fear I mentioned earlier.

    This “Master Lie” can also bring about smaller lies throughout the story. Whenever your character justifies some action, it could be a baby lie based on the Lie

    Flaw

    The Flaw is most tightly tied to Fear and Lie. Lie is the justification and Fear is the motivation. It’s used to pursue the Want (compare with Hornevian styles of Enneagram theory), and before the story began, it had been effective in protecting the character from Fear and obtaining wants. This was perhaps the worst thing that ever happened to the character. The more this Flaw has worked in the past, the harder it will be for your character to let it go and face the Fear without it. Instead the character may try harder to use it, only to push his Want further away. If your character can’t come to terms with this, he will end up destroying himself.

    When faced with the antagonist, this Flaw will be ineffective and perhaps even revealed to be the self-destructive behavior that it is. The antagonist and protagonist need to have something in common in their Triangles (apart from the Want, which is a tie in External Conflict) and this very often is the Flaw. The antagonist can exploit it in the protagonist, and the protagonist might see this Flaw for what it is when reflected in the antagonist. Such a moment is a slap of reality for your character that can never be undone.

    After this point, Flaw can truly be addressed and real strength will be allowed to take its place. A Flaw can also be seen as a sort of weakness and like any character weakness, it’s very satisfying when it can be turned around to serve as a strength. This also comes back to the idea of the character journeying from a “flawed” state to a “healed” state in Enneagram theory.

    Want

    A character has a Want. This is always the start of every story and the thing that hooks us at the beginning. We wonder, will the character obtain this Want? Reasons for the Want should be a mix of logical and emotional. Logical motives could be those anyone might use or relate to. Wanting money, fame, respect or love don’t really need explanation, but the unique emotional motives of this character is what really makes the story. What is this character missing that makes them want this thing?

    This feeling of lack deep in the character, protected by Flaw and all other elements of the persona, is what subconsciously drives the Want. It also is what Needs to be filled with true inner strength, not simply patched with the Want. All the same, the Want can still be a reward for achieving the Need of inner growth once the emotional motives have been challenged.

    The strongest emotional motive will be the Fear, but this might not be obvious to the audience or even the character at first. Learning why the character has this Want allows us to understand him and share the emotional stake in the story’s outcome. If there are no emotional motives for the Want, it’s too easy to ask why the character doesn’t turn back when the stakes get too high. There may also be logical reasons why the character is trapped in the conflict, but if there are no emotional motives as well, there is no internal conflict and this character is not central to this story.

    We don’t realize at the beginning that the Want is a way of avoiding the Need. The character’s Need must be met if he is to achieve the Want or if he does achieve the Want first, he will realize that it is no help to his deep inner lack after all and must instead turn to his Need.

    Need

    All the points of the Triangle come together here. The character Needs to face his Fear, overcome his Flaw, realize his Lies for what they are, and heal the reopened Wound. This is the most thematic point of the Triangle. It will come down to not only healing the Wound, but realizing inner growth that will make the character immune to future such wounds. The character will let go of past identity and realize the true self. Whether the Want was achieved or not, the Need is a must for a happy ending and might turn out to bring greater rewards than the sought after Want ever could.

    The Development of the Triangle

    My Internal Conflict Triangle has gone through a few revisions, and I don’t doubt it might go through a few more in the future. The elements have never changed but their relationships have shifted. For one thing, you might be wondering why I call it a Triangle when it technically has six points, even though they are arranged in pairs. Well, originally I was viewing these pairs as two sides of the same coin, especially Fear and Flaw. To Fear is a Flaw, and a Flaw is a manifestation of a deeply rooted Fear. Wound is the event and Lie is the rationalization of that event, the false lesson learned from it. Need and Want are still in the same pair for obvious reasons. They are both goals, one the character goes after, the other is the true reward in a happy ending.

    First incarnation of the Internal Conflict Triangle.

    The most important change, I think, is the movement of Fear further and further back into the roots of the Triangle. At first, Fear shared a point with Flaw as I saw them as both problems of the present the character has to deal with. But then I realized the Lie is more on the same level with Flaw than Fear. Flaw and Lie are both set ways of being that evolve from a past. Lie is the thought and Flaw is the action. Fear on the other hand, is much more closely linked to Wound, either it is caused by the Wound, or as I think now, it is the very root of every character that needs to grow. Character arc is about realizing the Fear holds no true power, and that you always had it within to become immune to the Wound.

    The importance of the order of events occurred to me when I made these changes. It matters what comes first because it shows what is at the core of character. Over the course of a story, the shells of protection need to be peeled off in the order in which they were established to get to this raw nerve where the Wound remains unhealed. Though the Wound is not the true core, it is the way we can see the effects of the Fear. This is the essence of Show don’t Tell. When we can see the character has come to terms with the past and is no longer troubled by the Wound, we know the Fear is conquered because it was only Fear that allowed the Wound to occur in the first place.

    It’s not unlike the idea in mystery writing that every story actually has two stories: the true order of events in backstory, and the order in which we experience them in the narrative itself. The journey of Internal Conflict can be thought of as sleuthing out the true source of problems in the character’s life

    Other Ways of Viewing the Triangle

    This somewhat free-floating form of character structure can also be viewed in a more linear way. If you broke the line of the Triangle between Wound and Need and stretched it out into a line, you would have a linear representation of story arc, a Character Timeline. Wound and Fear are Backstory, in the past, Flaw and Lie are the character’s present state, and the Want and Need are the goals for the future. (The label of “motivation” for the present worked better before I switched Lie and Fear around in the Triangle.)

    Ignoring the lines and looking at the Triangle as a circle or a wheel, you can see how the points directly across from each other are related. The Fear and Want are the Driving Force of the story, the Motivation and Incentive. The Lie and Need bring in the Theme, the Lie being a sort of anti-theme and the Need the realization of the theme’s lessons. Finally the Wound and Flaw have to do with the reader’s perception of the character. The Flaw can make the character unlikable yet relatable and the Wound gives us sympathy and deeper understanding. We’re no longer so quick to judge and we wonder what we ourselves might do in the same circumstances.

    This Internal Conflict Triangle is certainly not the only way to look at the makeup of characters or character arcs, but I hope it is as universal as any such sketch could be. Try it out and don’t be afraid to explore any changes that could more closely apply to your own characters. I’d love to hear what you think!