Character structure, in my opinion, is a definite prerequisite to story structure. Story structure without character structure will only be able to map out a superficial plot without any way to explore and relate to the conflict. The protagonist needs to traverse some sort of journey of internal conflict to bring this deeper meaning to the plot.
Internal conflict is a potential for growth, the ongoing struggle that takes the protagonist along a Character Arc. This series of states the character goes through shows that growth, or demise, depending on the type of arc. External conflict is the overall potential for struggle over the goal. Story Arc is the series of scenes that show that struggle unfold from potential to resolution. Your story needs both, internal and external conflicts, in order to form a tight Central Conflict
This outline follows the Central Conflict, which is the intersection of the internal and external conflicts. Each plot point forwards both conflicts along both the Character Arc and the Story Arc, though usually heavier on one or the other. This is also a work in progress as I’m working on adding more story examples.
Wound Event (internal conflict emphasis)
Shown through a prologue, if at all, this point is the birth of the internal conflict and is most often revealed later in the narrative as backstory. This past event resulted in the protagonist’s flawed starting state when the story opened. It’s what “marked” this particular character to become the protagonist of the story when faced with the external conflict.
Inciting Incident (external conflict emphasis)
The external conflict begins. This is often off stage but could also be a prologue showing the antagonist’s plans or actions that will soon effect the protagonist. There is usually no interaction with the internal conflict yet.
Show the protagonist in a characteristic moment and introduce the internal conflict. Expose part of the Internal Conflict Triangle, particularly the Flaw or Lie or both to demonstrate the character’s starting state. These qualities likely serve the protagonist well in his present situation, but could show themselves as weaknesses when the stakes are raised in the conflict with the antagonist. Show that the Want is important to this character as soon as possible.
Key Event (external conflict emphasis)
For the first time, internal and external conflicts clash and Central Conflict is born. This is the first point that must involve both the Character Arc and the Story Arc. The protagonist becomes personally involved with the external conflict. This is another opportunity to hit one or more of the points of the Triangle, particularly Fear and Wound since this is something that is happening to the protagonist, not an action on his part.
These important plot points all carry a one-two punch. An action and a reaction. Throughout the first half of the story, the action is on the part of the antagonist, and the protagonist is reacting, but after the Midpoint, the tables are turned.
Plot Point I (internal conflict emphasis)
For the past few scenes, the protagonist has probably been trying to find a way out of the conflict or even just tagging along. Here, something happens that finally forces him across the point of no return. He is set apart from the other characters involved and now must engage the conflict. There will have been scenes before that seem like there’s no turning back, the Key Event for one, but this is where the protagonist is singled out. The bigger story is now his story.
Though it might not be a conscious decision, this plot point requires an action on the part of the protagonist. Think back to the characteristic moment that introduced him. Is this a repetition of the Flaw or a change to a discovery of unknown strengths? These two are usually two sides of the same coin. Also think about the Fear, whether this caused the push across the no-return point, or the Fear was hit as a result, the protagonist almost always feels it here.
Often, the reason this is a point of no return is because, whether the protagonist realizes it or not, the antagonist has recognized the protagonist as such. The protagonist has stepped into a much larger conflict than he intended or perhaps even realized. More is at stake than what motivated him to take action. Theme and meaning are tied into the outcome of the conflict now as well. This point is also the first admittance to what the story is really about. What’s the focus? How do the character and plot, the internal and external conflicts, relate?
Examples…
In The Hunger Games, Katniss shoots the apple out of the pigs mouth at her demonstration, setting herself apart from the rest. She is no longer just another tribute. This is the first step in her unconscious shifting goal of winning the Games to defying them. She is becoming the protagonist of the larger conflict, not just her own. Before, her actions were motivated by her goal of protecting her sister, even the her desire to win the Games is strengthened by her promise to Prim. This action, however, was motivated by rash anger at the Gamemakers and as she later realizes, could be directly conflicted with her goal of protecting Prim. Immediately afterwards, it triggers her own deepest Fear that her family will be punished for her actions.
In Pride and Prejudice, the threat of the Bennett sisters is recognized by Mr. Darcy during the dance at Netherfield, though the magnitude of this is unrealized by Elizabeth at the time. This is what causes him to detach Mr. Bingley from Jane and convince him to remain in London and not to return to Hertfordshire. This is a taste of worst case scenario for the Bennett sisters, becoming old maids or having to marry for convenience.
In Ready Player One, Parzival obtains the Copper Key, immediately and permanently making his name known to all of the Oasis. In this moment he goes from absolute insignificance and obscurity to the most important and famous player in the Oasis. Just after this, he meets Art3mis, and his relationship with her is the true focus of the story within the setting of the Hunt.
In It’s A Wonderful Life, George Baily takes a blow when his father dies from a stroke. He tries to protect the Building and Loan because of his father, but he only really fights back when Potter attacks his father’s character. In this speech directed at Potter, he unwittingly singles himself out as the protagonist of the story, the only one who can save the Building and Loan and so also Bedford Falls from becoming Pottersville. The closeup of Potter shows this recognition of the threat that George poses. The other board members saw this drive in George as well when they appoint him to run the Building and Loan. George’s choice is to either leave and let Potter destroy his father’s lifework, or to stay and protect it. He knew when he chose to stay that it was a point of no return. He had said it himself, “I’m going to school, this is my last chance!”
Introduce Antagonist (external conflict emphasis)
This point can happen anytime between the Key Event and Pinch Point I. Conflict and an antagonist force existed before, but this gives it has a name and a body. We know who exactly we’re up against. Action and reaction cycles follow as the conflict escalates.
Pinch Point I (external conflict emphasis)
This is the first big success for antagonist force. The protagonist is left shaken, but perhaps not yet conscious of the effect on internal conflict. Reactions focus on what’s the next move in external conflict, rather than any sort of self-examination. The situation is dangerous but not hopeless and the protagonist takes action to regroup in the face of this new awareness of the antagonist’s power.
Midpoint (Plot Point II) (internal conflict emphasis)
Everything changes after this point. Something happens to make the protagonist see that he’s hit a dead end in his efforts against the antagonist. This is a moment of realization and change of fortune. If things were looking up before, this is where hopes will be shattered and the protagonist may hesitate and question methods and motives and true wants and needs. If things were bleak, this is where new hope will be offered and the protagonist will be able to take new action that was impossible before. This point also includes an introspective moment where the Lie is explored. The protagonist sees it for what it really is, if even for only a moment. After this point, the protagonist takes the initiative and is not just left reacting to antagonist attacks. Also the first seed of the Need is planted in the protagonist’s mind, which sets him on the path towards conquering his internal conflict.
Pinch Point II (external conflict emphasis)
This is a severe blow to Protagonist’s Triangle, particularly Fear and Wound (the most deeply rooted and vulnerable point, the one the a character tries the hardest to conceal and protect.) This causes inescapable turmoil of internal conflict and the protagonist may already be weakened from energy spent during the Midpoint. The resolve or revelation gained by it may be shaken and the protagonist’s actions in following scenes may be aimless or without a clear plan while he recovers
Plot Point III (internal conflict emphasis)
This is the first time the protagonist commits to action based on the introspection of the Midpoint. It’s another point of no return which throws the story out of its previous cycle and into a new direction. If Plot Point I was the doorway into conflict, then Plot Point III is the break for the exit.
The scenes leading up to this are the last calm before the storm of act III and the climax. Momentum from Plot Point I has long since worn out, indecision and indirection worsened since the Midpoint, so there needs to be a new direction for the final push out of the conflict. The protagonist’s way of thinking has been slowly changing since Pinch Point I or even as late as the Midpoint, but this is the first time we see it proven through action.
Before this, the protagonist was still hoping for an easy way out, perhaps just trying to wait out the conflict, but something will have to change that. This action will be a complete turnaround in priorities and either going after a different goal, or going after the same goal, now backed with new motives. The Character Triangle point of importance here is future oriented, Want and Need
Examples…
In The Hunger Games, Peeta and Katniss have been recuperating and waiting out the Games in the cave. When they are invited to the Banquet for something they desperately need, she decides to drug him so she can get the medicine he needs to live. This is the first time she puts someone else’s life above her own in the arena and it is directly linked to her realization that he saved her life during the Midpoint.
Climax (Pinch Point III) (external conflict emphasis
This includes both the climax of the internal and the external conflicts. The protagonist’s “Blackest Moment” is the climax of internal conflict and the protagonist’s lowest point. It’s the final temptation the protagonist is offered and must overcome in order to heal the Wound for good. The “Climactic Moment” is the peak of external conflict, the big battle with the antagonist and the winning of the protagonist’s goal (in a happy ending). Proof of the change in the protagonist from the Blackest Moment will be shown through action in this Climactic Moment.
Resolution (internal conflict emphasis)
The conflict is resolved and we show the protagonist’s growth through parallels and compare and contrast with how he was at the beginning of the story.
If you’ve been reading about the types and just can’t decide which one is right, or even if you’ve never given the Enneagram a thought, these starting points might help you narrow in on what’s most important in your story and what type protagonist would be best to explore it. Every story needs a strong Central Conflict, where the External and Internal Conflicts are inseparably linked.
Not all of these methods will spark the right ideas, they might not all even fit in retrospect once you have selected a type and developed the story, but all of them can be used as a place to start digging and discover what enneatype might be the best fit for the protagonist of your story.
By First Impression and Visualization
If you saw a character before you saw a story, this might be a great place to start. Try thinking about how you imagine this character and what makes you picture him this way. Even if you’ve had trouble selecting a type by overall descriptions, give this a try anyway. Forget about whatever has made you conflicted over your choice of type and instead picture your character. Nevermind appearances, focus on behavior. How does he act around his friends? How does he act around strangers? Whether she’s sure of herself or not, is she quick or slow to action?
These, I think, are the most prominent characteristics of each of the types. Try out whichever one jumps out at you and see if that type fits the story according to the other methods.
One knows their way of thinking is the best and wonders why others don’t hold themselves to the same high standards.
Two never thinks of self and can’t stand to be idle, so is always busy doing for others.
Three is charming with people, thrives on work and knows how to get things accomplished.
Four is imaginative, deeply moved by emotion, embraces and is troubled by the idea that they are unlike anyone else.
Five is most happy existing in the mind and feels drained by the need to go out among people and away from familiar comforts.
Six is highly risk-conscious, full of doubts, but is eager to prove themselves and their loyalty.
Seven is full of passion for life and new experiences and is often blinded to the wants of others by their enthusiasm in the pursuit of their own dreams.
Eight is never intimidated by others and is relentless in maintaining control over their own situation and possessions.
Nine enjoys peacefulness and togetherness but will hide or flee from turmoil around them to seek solitude if quiet can be found in no other way.
These descriptions are deliberately superficial for the sake of clarity. Soon I will be adding links to deeper analysis of fictional characters of that type and what evidence from their stories I used to come to that conclusion. If you still are torn between two or three types, try these methods of narrowing down your choice.
Check to see their relationships to each other on the Enneagram. You may be picturing your character at their stress or security point at some times and at their base type at others.
See which types are notoriously mistyped as which other types and what important differences can be used to distinguish them. (Mistyping at first is not a bad thing and can actually help to figure out how your character might be lying to himself by how he sees himself compared to how he really is.)
Pay attention to the situations in which you are picturing this character. Is this a proactive or reactive moment? Look at the Hornevian and Harmonic groups to decide which type would behave in this way at different times.
Take a look at the selection methods below, keeping in mind the types you’ve considered
By Premise or Plot
These are the most prominent elements of any story and so perhaps the most important when it comes to what sort of protagonist takes the stage. Premise and plot are different things, but for this purpose we can think of them as nearly the same. Both have to do with the situation and actions in the story that directly effect your protagonist. A premise can be explored through any enneatype, but depending on which one you pick, the plot will likely be different. Certain plots will be most effective with particular types of protagonists because those events would be most likely to fuel internal conflict in that type.
Ask yourself these questions. What sort of world do they live in? What sort of life do they lead? What are they forced to do or prevented from doing? What is it in the external conflict that pulls and tears at the protagonist’s internal conflict? Another way to think of it, what situation is the protagonist in that stirs up unbearable and irreconcilable inner conflict?
Which of the following generic premises describes the most prominent way in which the external conflict effects your protagonist?
One is at risk of becoming corrupted, has accidentally done wrong, or been the cause of evil.
Two cares deeply about others but has no appreciation or love.
Three‘s hard earned accomplishments have been destroyed or become meaningless.
Four has been misunderstood and can’t be sure what is wrong with or missing from their own life.
Five has been compelled, in a way they themselves can hardly explain, to enter a conflict they may be unprepared to cope with.
Six has had to leave a place of security and must learn to trust their own judgement.
Seven has been denied their dreams and is forced to struggle and endure pain, unable to appreciate comforts in life.
Eight has little to no control over their own situation or future.
Nine will never have peace while a conflict remains unaddressed.
As you can see, these definitions by premise and plot are directly linked to the Fear of each type. Whatever the external conflict has to offer must be the worst thing the protagonist can imagine in order for there to be a strong internal conflict and as effective a story as possible. Whatever methods the protagonist has been using to manage conflicts before the story starts will prove to be ineffective against the antagonist. For each type, this brings about a universal fear of Loss of Identity. If being who they’ve been all their lives can no longer save them from their fears, who must they become to survive? Must they either loose who they are or perish? To each type these two seem one in the same, and in order to survive they must learn that they are not their identity. In this way, the consequences of this conflict are either death or liberation. It can be their demise or their salvation depending on their choices.
Each of the above premises might be something any type might avoid, and certainly their own unique fears could have been explored through them, but in each case, only one type is directly threatened by loss of their identity. Questioning who we are is the most terrifying and difficult thing to answer, but one your protagonist must grapple with at the root of their internal conflict.
By Starting State
Establishing the protagonist’s starting state is one of the most important elements to setting the stakes in any story. Luckily, this is also the part of the story that most writers can picture long before they put down the opening sentence. I’ve noticed these clear patterns by type in many of the stories I’ve looked at so far. A character starts out a certain way, until a key event pushes them into the conflict and they take the role of protagonist. See which one of these sounds most like the start of your story. (Keep in mind these might not fit some character arcs unless you take backstory into account.)
One knows exactly what to do and doesn’t hesitate to act, but this world falls apart when they realize something has gone terribly wrong.
Two is on a mission to help others but is met with rejection and no appreciation for their service.
Three is confident and successful, everything in life is looking up, until all they’ve worked for is suddenly at risk.
Four is missing something, but has no idea what that something could be. They feel misunderstood until they encounter something new that might be the answer to filling the emptiness.
Five is content to live in the isolated life they’ve created for themselves, until something happens that draws them out and compels them to action.
Six has either never been a risk taker, or has always taken risk in spite of themselves, but now in a rash moment has bitten off more than they can chew and must rely on their own judgement to navigate the consequences.
Seven knows exactly what they want and how to get it. They’ve got big dreams, but they encounter their first hurdle of internal conflict when these dreams are denied.
Eight has their life mostly under control until a new threat arises that may be too big even for them to handle.
Nine has managed to avoid conflict all their life, but now is forced into the arena with the knowledge that only they can bring about peace.
By Security Point
What would do this character the most good? You can use the security point to find the base type that might suit your character best. Think about your character’s ruts. What type would do them the most good in avoiding the usual pitfalls of their way of thinking? This usually will involve some form of “relax and let go of your fears”.
One would do well to let go of obsession with perfection and enjoy life like a Seven.
Two would do well to let go of the need to be needed by others and focus on self like a Four.
Three would do well to let go of competitiveness and become cooperative like a Six.
Four would do well to rise out of the depths of painful emotions and strive for self betterment like a One.
Five would do well to come out of hiding and address conflicts like an Eight.
Six would do well to quiet the worrying mind and achieve inner peace like a Nine.
Seven would do well to quit running towards excitement and look inside like a Five.
Eight would do well to let down walls of protection and become open and generous like a Two.
Nine would do well to embrace what they want, even if it means rippling waters, and pursue it like a Three.
Be careful not to confuse what would be good for this character with what their friends might think would be good for them. This direction is often the type’s Stress point. Friends of a Five might say, “You should go out to a party, let your hair down, be more like a Seven!” but if that Five actually behaved this way, it would not be self-betterment, it would be a crisis, a cry for help. Not that the good points of a Seven would be bad for a Five, but emulating Seveness is a self-destructive shortcut, all too easy to fall into, and the Five will face self-loathing for going there. It may actually entrench the Five’s usual way of being and become an obstacle to achieving Eightness, the true path of growth for the Five.
Some have the idea that both Stress and Security points can be expressed in positive and negative ways. They then call them Connecting Points and while I do agree that both can be used both ways under certain circumstances, I still think there are clear distinctions between them.
By Stress Point
What would be their downfall? What behaviors would signal a downward spiral? This would be a miserable time for your protagonist, a time of self loathing or denial. These methods of acting out can also be used to let off pent up stress, or as an alternative course of action to obtain their goals, but even though they might sometimes be effective, they are never actually healthy.
One can’t hold it up anymore and feels isolated by unique suffering and may even give in to these emotions like a Four
Two is frustrated by constant sacrifice being taken for granted or even going unnoticed by others and becomes controlling and confrontational like an Eight.
Three struggles with failures and wonders what’s the purpose of their goals in life and becomes unambitious and complacent like a Nine.
Four feels threatened by rejection and becomes clingy and willing to sacrifice like a Two.
Five has withdrawn as much as possible but still feels invaded and turns to diversions to avoid inner pain like a Seven.
Six sees their imagined fears becoming reality and finally jumps into action to address them like a Three.
Seven is unhappy and goes deeper into denial, avoiding unpleasant emotions by becoming focused and dedicated to work like a One.
Eight has created more enemies for themselves than they can take on and retreats, becoming reclusive like a Five
Nine can no longer maintain inner and outer tranquility and becomes aware of dangers and worried like a Six.
Whatever method you use to find the type that will have the most impact in your story, remember that almost any type can find conflict in any premise. Some may need additional motives to confront the conflict in the case of Withdrawn or Compliant types, or to find themselves in a dilemma in the face of conflict with the Assertive types.
Don’t be afraid to explore the possibilities of types that didn’t immediately seem obvious. You might be surprised what you find!
When I first encountered the Enneagram, I immediately thought of character development. At the time I had been slightly disappointed with the characters I was developing with other inner conflict diagrams and character sketch methods (including my own) and I realized it was because not all the parts of my characters always matched. They needed consistency in their motivations as well as flaws and fears that would naturally come from the wounds they had experienced.
Maybe you’re lucky and, unlike me, you actually have a good intuition about people and how they’re put together, (strangely that sort of thing is helpful in character development). But if you sometimes don’t understand people’s motives, especially those you yourself would not share, or even if you just want to explore characters with a deeper understanding, the Enneagram can become your most essential tool.
What is the Enneagram?
The Enneagram (from the Greek, “ennea” meaning “nine” and “gram” meaning “figure”) is depicted as a nine-pointed figure representing the nine personality types that can be applied to everyone. The lines and overall shape reveal patterns that indicate how each type relates to the others and how they react in good times and bad.
The Enneagram is a group of nine personality types, not just a set of static types, but an interactive system of dynamic types that respond differently in times of safety and under stress (defined by Stress and Security points) and take on varying amounts of the traits of their neighboring types (called Wings). Each type has a gradient of behaviors and emotions from unhealthy to healthy (according to the Levels of Development) and is motivated by different emotions and wants (determined by its Triad).
The make-up of each type and their arrangement around the Enneagram are not arbitrary. The patterns and overall shape of the symbol itself as well as the positions of each of the types can tell us exactly what each type is made of. Looking at these shapes and patterns are a great way to use the Enneagram and examine each of the types more deeply. Just like it’s easier to remember and provides more understanding to study how the periodic table is arranged rather than just memorize the qualities of the various elements. The positions themselves on the table tell you everything you need to know about each member.
Many patterns can be found in the shape of the Enneagram, most importantly its ability to break down into three different sets of three. Philosophically this mirrors the “Law of Threes”, the Enneagram symbol itself even being made of three shapes (circle, triangle and hexad).
How is the Enneagram a tool for writers?
The Enneagram is ripe for character development. It takes into consideration a person’s backstory, wounds, fears, flaws or weaknesses, motives, how they interact with others, what they want and need and why as well as a guide for the future in how to discover the true self, which is the essence of what the character arc in any story should be. This path towards growth is even insightful for negative arcs where characters do the opposite of what they would need to save themselves. All of these things are the points we try to cover when developing our characters, so why not look to a system that already explores them for inspiration?
I can hear an answer and let me say this:
Don’t worry about writing formulaic or unauthentic characters.
Don’t worry about stifling their natural development in the story.
The Enneagram can help us structure solid character arcs, see the true internal conflicts of our characters and keep them consistent throughout the story. There are lots of starting points we can look at when it comes to applying the Enneagram to our story and characters. It won’t force our characters to be anything other than they already are, but it might help us see things in them that were clouded before. No matter what clues we use to narrow in on our character’s type, in the end the benefit should be the same. To discover what exactly is the best sort of character to explore the struggles your story is about and create a focused through-line where the external and internal conflicts intersect to form the central conflict.
Characters are not real people, and just as good dialogue is meant to capture the flavor of real speech, not copy it verbatim, so should characters just be good representations of people. Real people are messy, as are their lives and this can make it difficult to formulate a coherent story, but with the aid of the Enneagram, we can see just what parts of people should be whittled away, leaving us with efficient, functional characters to live out the stories they were born to. Stories with classic structure also give us the opportunities to see all the sides of a character’s personality, something that isn’t so obvious in real life. We can gain first hand understanding of a character through internal monologue and, unlike real people, can truly know their motives. Just like every person is unique yet can gain some deeper understanding of themselves with the Enneagram, so it can be with your characters.
Character Sketching with the Enneagram
Here I will mostly refer to a book called The Wisdom of the Enneagram by Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson (also authors of Personality Types). This book could be the ultimate handbook to character development and perhaps the only one you would ever need. Chapters 3 and 4 are particularly applicable to character development in general and I have created a chart below that correlates the Enneagram terms into common character and story structure terms you are probably already familiar with.
The Wisdom of the Enneagram Terms (Chapters 3 & 4) to Character Sketch and Story Structure Terms
The Wisdom of the Enneagram
Character and Story Structure
Childhood Wound or Wound
Wound, Ghost or Scar
Unconscious Childhood Message
Lie
Basic Fear
Fear
Basic Desire (and its Distortion)
Want/Motivation (Flaw)
Lost Childhood Messages
Theme/Need?
Spiritual Jump Starts
Flaw
Core Identifications
Character Sketch
Invitation to Abundance
Need
Notice that the Flaw in Enneagram terms is called the Spiritual Jump Start. This points out that a character’s flaw is not only an obstacle or a “bad thing”, but an opportunity for growth. Our characters realizing where they have failings and either overcoming or giving in determines the sort of arc they are on and story you are telling.
I was excited to find that all of these terms matched the points of the Internal Conflict Triangle I’d been working on as shown below. Here I will focus on how this structure relates to the Enneagram.
These points are fairly general, even when you look at unique the Fear, Lie, Flaw, Want, etc of an individual enneatype. You will want to zoom in from there within the context of your character’s story and determine a more specific Wound, Fear, Lie, Flaw, Want and Need. For example, what is the exact backstory that shows us the Wound your character received? How did he internalize this experience and come out with the Fear and Lie that he did? How do these manifest in the current Flaw and Want that he lives with and what Need could bring a cure to this long unhealed Wound?
The Enneagram can be especially helpful in making sure all the points of your character’s Triangle match. Otherwise it can be easy to loose sight of the through-line in your character arc and pick a Flaw and Fear or some other points that don’t really match each other. When guided by the nine types, it is easy to see where to dig into the psyche of each character and find what conflicts lie buried there.
A whole person is a blend of all types in varying proportions, but the one that is considered the base type is the one that is most dominant. There are many ways you could use the Enneagram to find your protagonist’s type. Try taking a free test and answer as your character. Or look at plot, theme or other knowns about your story and grow your protagonist from there. Think of the most defining element of your story and consider what characteristic would be most important in your protagonist to support that.
Or you could build your character from the inside out by examining the Enneagram as it is broken down into various groups. Start with the point of the character triangle most vital to your story, or whatever you have, even if only an impression, and piece by piece work your way out from there until you’ve completed the character triangle. If you are unsure about settling on one of the nine types or can’t decide which is the best fit, it might be easier to narrow it down first to one of the various groups. Even if you’ve already decided on an enneatype, try exploring the possibility of a different type through this process.
Building Character From the Inside Out
The word “personality” is derived from the Latin word for “mask”, (also where we get “persona”) and “character” comes from the Greek meaning “engraving into stone”. So personality is not who a person really is, but rather a way that have come to interact with the world. When we say someone has a great personality, we are really referring to the layer that protects their true character from their fears. The protagonist will be forced to see this mask for what it really is when it proves inadequate protection in the conflict against the antagonist.
Character sketch templates that include a line for personality can make it difficult to dig deeper and first develop the core of the character. It’s too easy to think of very shallow and external qualities such as how they behave around others without any thought to how those behaviors came about. Personality, in the way we commonly think of it, is best when it emerges naturally later on and trying to define it first can make a character flat or even inconsistent with their inner selves.
In this overview I will avoid calling the nine types by their featured quality or listing a rundown of each type. Instead, I will focus on dissecting the Enneagram and briefly examining its patterns. If you want a list or chart summarizing each type I recommend going to the Enneagram Institute or opening to the introduction of any book on the Enneagram (The Wisdom of the Enneagram includes an in-depth chapter for each type).
There is nothing wrong with defining the types in this way, but I think growing a character from scratch (or even re-examining an existing character under the lens of the Enneagram) with the building blocks that make up each type will help you understand your character more deeply and arrive at the type best suited to your story and other characters. It can be easy to become swayed by the superficial descriptions and it is for this reason that tests to help determine your own type provide a series of questions with no mention of the individual types. Even the most honest and self-aware can easily mistype themselves and mistyping doesn’t necessarily mean we are lying to ourselves, but it can happen when stereotypes come to mind or we have slightly different connotations for the words used to describe the types.
Start with an open mind and imagination. As you build, your character will become more unique and well suited to her particular story, the antagonist and other characters.
Divided by Thirds
Picture these as layers, each one augmenting the similar types into slightly different directions until each of the nine times become unique, yet still related. Every type has a completely unique make-up and no two types are both members of more than one of the same group.
Most commonly, the Enneagram is divided into its Triads, but it can also be divided into three Hornevian groups and three Harmonic groups. Each of these three ways breaks down the overall shape of the Enneagram into thirds and groups the types according to different qualities they have in common. Many patterns can be seen when looking at the Enneagram this way and its a great starting place to explore the very root of a character.
When it might be difficult to decide between two similar types (especially if you are looking at their behaviors more than their motivations), comparing them by their differences can make things more clear. The questionnaire in the beginning of The Wisdom of the Enneagram, the Riso-Hudson QUEST, works this way. The two questions ask you to choose one of three paragraphs from two groups that best describes you. The paragraphs in the first group each fit the types in one of the three Hornevian groups and the paragraphs in the second group each fit the types in one of the three Harmonic groups.
By selecting one paragraph from each you can arrive at a specific type similarly to running along the rows and columns of a multiplication table to the one box that holds the answer. It’s often much easier for us to pick one paragraph each from two groups of three than it is to compare nine different types all at once and try to determine which characteristics are most important and should guide our decision. We can easily cling to a type or deny other types because of a single line we interpret a certain way.
The Triads
The Triads are usually called the Body, Heart, and Head types. (Sometimes other names such as Instinctual, Feeling and Thinking are used.) The Body types are Eight, Nine and One, the Heart types are Two, Three and Four and the Head types are Five, Six and Seven.
These names should not suggest that these are areas of strength for the various types. Actually the opposite is true. The types in each Triad primarily identify with this part of themselves rather than the other parts. In Enneagram terms, this indicates a weakness or vulnerability in the true self where ego has stepped in to fill the gap. In story terms, this weakness was caused by the wound event and in order to heal it, a character will have to let go of this identity with the ego and learn that they can rely on their true self.
The more “flawed” a character is, the more obvious his enneatype may be. A very centered and self-aware person is not likely to give us many opportunities to see the sort of problems his type is prone to. The internal conflict of every story will only resolve when the protagonist realizes his own inner strength, and no longer relies on the ego to protect him in this area.
The most defining differences among the Triads are their emotional motives and what they want in order to satisfy this emotion. Body types are driven by anger and want autonomy for protection and to feel safe in their bodies. They want to be able to effect their environment without being effected by it themselves, in this way maintaining their own self-defined ego boundaries. Heart types are driven by shame and want attention to feel loved. They put their efforts in creating a self image that reflects the way they want to be seen, since they struggle with love of themselves, they need the love and appreciation of others to feel validated. And Head types are driven by fear and want security to bring them peace of mind.
(Note that autonomy and security are not the same thing. Someone can easily give up their autonomy to be protected by someone else and feel secure. Also security and attention are not the same thing. Just because you have many admiring friends does not mean they will be able or willing to help you in time of need.)
Everyone has all the same emotions, but depending on our type, some of these are easier to ignore or simply experience rather than act upon than others. Each Triad is partly defined by the emotion that is hardest to ignore and is the most motivating for those types. They are also the emotions that the types of each Triad repress and identify with the least (with the exception of the Reactive Harmonic group). These emotions are what they struggle to manage, suppress and what makes them feel exposed and vulnerable when the emotion shows. The emotions of each Triad are not the only ones experienced by those types nor do the types experience these emotions any more strongly than the other types, but the types of each Triad are most motivated to action by the particular emotion of each Triad. Just because a type is in the Body Triad, doesn’t mean they never experience fear or shame. They do feel these emotions just like everyone else, but anger is the emotion that will motivate Body types to action the most.
Here is a more detailed overview of how each type in each Triad tries to achieve their wants and avoid their fears. This will be reflected again later on in the Hornevian Groups.
Body
Eights direct their control outwards, physically controlling their space and possessions, even loved ones which they often view as extensions of themselves. Ones enforce control inward, shunning thoughts and feelings they don’t identify with and encouraging those that they do see as part of themselves. And Nines fight on both fronts, attempting to keep their physical world in order and also maintaining the peaceful mindset they wish to have.
Heart
Twos do things for others in order to be seen and loved. Fours create an imaginary self of how they wish to be and attempt to present it to others in a mysterious or alluring way. And Threes bring balance, both striving for accomplishments that people will notice and admire, but also grooming an imagined self image they wish to attain.
Head
Fives fear the world and are insecure about their abilities to cope in it, so they retreat into the mind to wait for a time when they believe it will be safe for them to come out again. Sevens fear their own insecurities and negative feelings, so they launch into activities that will fill their lives with pleasant and fun experiences, thus evading their inner fears. And Sixes are afraid in both areas, so are constantly alternating between running from inner fears and then back again, retreating from outer fears (this is the Six’s phobic/counter-phobic cycle).
The Triads each have their own perspective on time as well. Body types focus on the present, Heart types on the past and Head types on the future. This makes sense when you think about the main driving emotion for each Triad. We tend to get angry about the present (Body), shameful about the past (Heart) and fearful about the future (Head).
Being a Head type myself, I was constantly working out rational motivations for my characters and overlooking emotional ones, particularly emotions that tend not to motivate me. It seems perfectly reasonable to me that everyone could be motivated by fear and want security. Here, the Enneagram can be a great help to us in understanding emotional motives we don’t necessarily relate to.
Consider your protagonist. When something happens to him, what is his immediate reaction? Does he first think, feel or act? Which emotion will trigger the most violent response? Fear, anger or shame? Think about which area, when in conflict, causes the greatest turmoil inside your character. Where does she feel weakest yet conceal and compensate for the most? What makes him feel most vulnerable even if revealed only to himself?
The Hornevian Groups
The three Hornevian groups (named after psychiatrist Karen Horney) show us which method each of the types take to satisfy their main driving emotion and want of their triad and how they see themselves relative to others.
Each group is connected by an isosceles triangle composed of two neighboring types and the type directly across the circle. Types Eight, Seven and Three are Assertive, types One, Two and Six are Compliant and types Five, Four and Nine are Withdrawn. Each of these types already have these tendencies, but when put under stress they will cope with their main driving emotion and attempt to gain what they want by becoming even more assertive, compliant or withdrawn.
Ironically, this usually just makes their problems worse, possibly even making their worst fears realized. For example, a Four feeling shame and withdrawing in the hopes of attracting the desired attention will likely be seen as abandoning those she would hope to attract, and become shunned as a result. An Eight struggling with anger and becoming more assertive in order to control his situation will likely end up creating more enemies who will rise up and attempt to neutralize him. Unless your character realizes and can cope with the fact that they have been the cause of their own worse fears and are willing to change in order to overcome their struggles, there will be no happy ending.
Types that seem similar on the outside because of their coping style, can actually have very different emotions and motivations driving their actions. The neighboring types within each group react for similar reasons, but the member of the group across the isosceles triangle is the odd man out, acting in a similar way but for different reasons, often opposite reasons. For example, types Eight and Seven assert themselves from a position of self-confidence whereas Threes assert themselves to compensate for their uncertainties and reliance on other’s views of them, something that Eights and Sevens care little to nothing about. Fours and Fives are consciously drawn to their imaginary worlds whereas Nines end up drifting or driven there. Ones and Twos are compliant in order to prove their value to others whereas Sixes are also driven to comply by feelings of insecurity.
Assertive
These types increase and strengthen ego boundaries to maintain their sphere of influence and protect what they want. They can have trouble processing emotions, so they take action instead. The odd man out here is Three, acting confident as the Eight and Seven but with a lack of self assurance and needing to feel they are seen as confident by others.
Compliant
This group can sometimes struggle to recognize exactly what they want deep down, often thinking of what those around them or the society as a whole values first. They are not necessary compliant to the wishes of people around them, but to their accepted expectations of them, and they seek ways to be responsible and help others. This position subtlety, even unconsciously, gives them a feeling of being better than others. The odd man out is Six, also struggling with feelings of inferiority and more consciously motivated by their efforts being reciprocated.
Withdrawn
These escape into the mind and an imagined world. Fours and Fives distinctly feel different than others so are more readily drawn into the mind. The odd man out is Nine, who would gladly participate in activities with others, but can end up drifting into thought or driven to withdraw by conflict around him.
When placed under stress, does your protagonist tend to fight back, go along with things or hide? It might be easy to say any protagonist must fight back in order to make the story worthwhile, but many protagonists would rather keep the peace or run away if they could. Only when they have no choice do they fight, and this internal conflict can make an even more engaging story than one with a protagonist that is always ready and willing to fight.
The Harmonic Groups
Whereas the Hornevian groups tell us how each type goes after what they want, the Harmonic groups indicate how each person copes when they do not get what they want. Every story will have as many setbacks as successes, if not more, so this part of your character will play a big part in how he reacts to the antagonist force.
The Harmonic groups are arranged by skipping every other type around the circle of the Enneagram. Each is centered by one of the three triangle types (Three, Six and Nine), and flanked by the two types that are often similar in their reactions to disappointment. They are the Positive Outlook group (Seven, Nine and Two), Competency group (One, Three and Five) and Reactive group (Four, Six and Eight).
Positive Outlook
This group will try and see the good side of things even in the face of disaster and they believe that feelings (their own and/or other’s) are important. Twos do this because they truly believe in the value of seeing the positives and want to help and encourage others. Sevens are more motivated by their own comfort when handling emotions and will shun negative thinking in an effort to avoid experiencing unpleasant feelings. Nines being the center of the group represent balance in that while they are motivated by concerns of personal comfort, they also genuinely want the people around them to get along and be happy. This determination towards positive thinking, mostly in Nines and Sevens, can lead to living in denial, no longer providing a helpful optimism.
Competency
These types react to difficulties by becoming more logical and objective, putting aside their personal feelings. Ones try to view the world the way others have defined it in a desire to be seen as upstanding and they think others should as well, while Fives readily reject the ideas of others if they disagree. Threes take a balanced approach, appreciating the system others have set up and working within it for the sake of their image, but they aren’t afraid to break the rules if it can lead to a strategic gain.
Reactive
These are much less able to deny or detach from their emotions, which instead come out in some form of action. When Eights feel strong emotion and can no longer conceal it, they will react by attacking (not necessarily physically) those they feel provoked the emotion to compensate for the feeling of weakness. Fours will either withdraw to nurture their fantasies or try to express themselves and hope to elicit sympathy, either way their efforts are an attempt to provoke some sort of action. Sixes maintain a balance, letting off steam without necessary directing it as an attack. If in a phobic cycle, their complaints may be an attempt to gain sympathy or if in a counter-phobic cycle, their outlet of emotion maybe an attack.
Look to the Harmonic groups for the defining characteristic of your protagonist, since this will determine how he responds to defeat and shows what he’s made of and what’s important to him at key moments throughout the story. The methods of pursuing goals (as show by the Hornevian groups) and the coping styles when goals are not met (as show by Harmonic groups) may indicate a pattern your protagonist will need to break in order to achieve inner growth and the main goal of the story.
Putting it All Together
Considering each of these three sets, the Triads (what they want and why), Hornevian (how they go after it) and Harmonic groups (how they respond when they fail), think of your character’s backstory and wound. What is the driving emotion motivating her to act out the way she does? What method of obtaining her wants does she employ? What emotion is going to be the most difficult for him to struggle with throughout the external conflict? How willing is he to face a fight and how will avoiding or attacking the conflict make it worse?
The wants, motivations, methods and reactions of these groups are the generic, basic aspects that are common to lots of people, but thinking about your characters within the limits of these groups will help you keep their actions and motives consistent, and allow them to make specific choices in the story that are true to who they are. These specific choices will be the pursuit of goals that, in the context of the character’s world, provide either Autonomy, Security or Attention and one of these must be dominant in the story.
For example, we know a Heart type will always care what other people think of them. They won’t suddenly throw this motivation out the window to go after a goal that may alienate their friends. If your story requires this, your protagonist can still be a Heart type, but this will be a constant conflict for them and a strong counter-motivation will need to be present. This can actually be a very effective way to emotionally rip your character in two directions, greatly fueling internal conflict. Just because each type is primarily and innately motivated by one emotion does not mean they cannot be motivated by other emotions.
Motives are perhaps the single most defining characteristic, in fictional characters especially, for determining enneatypes. We are lucky with characters in that we are usually pretty well informed as to their motives, something that makes attempting to type real people a problem. You can never really know what someone else is thinking or why they do what they do, they may not even be certain themselves without some introspection, but we can always be pretty sure about what’s going on inside our characters.
Follow the “Multiplication Table”
Looking at the types this way, we can let go of the commonly used labels for each type and avoid stereotypes. We understand the mechanics, what the character is made of, not just what they look like on the surface. The stereotypical images might be helpful at first to remember the various types, and they definitely provoke a more immediate picture, but they don’t necessarily show us why these types behave the way they do and how all the types blend into a gradient along the circle. Now, we see an Eight as more than “the Challenger”, but as an Assertive, Reactive person concerned with the Present, trying to achieve Autonomy and dealing externally with Anger.
Look over the chart below, keeping in mind your answers to the questions throughout the sections above. What sort of person does your protagonist need to be?
Dealing internally with Anger, Complies to earn Autonomy and responds Logically.
Two
Dealing externally with Shame, Complies to earn Attention and remains Positive.
Three
Dealing inside and out with Shame, Asserts to demand Attention and responds Logically.
Four
Dealing internally with Shame, Withdraws to gain Attention and Reacts strongly.
Five
Dealing externally with Fear, Withdraws to gain Security and responds Logically.
Six
Dealing inside and out with Fear, Complies to earn Security and Reacts strongly.
Seven
Dealing internally with Fear, Asserts to demand Security and remains Positive.
Eight
Dealing externally with Anger, Asserts to demand Autonomy and Reacts strongly.
Nine
Dealing inside and out with Anger, Withdraws to gain Autonomy and remains Positive.
If you are torn between two types, think about how they are different rather than how they’re alike. Use the various groups to compare them. Neighbors in different Triads should stand apart from each other particularly well this way as they will have different wants and motives. If they are in the same Triad, use the Hornevian groups to think about the differences in how they tend to go about getting what they want or the Harmonic groups to compare how they react if they fail. Each Hornevian group has a pair of neighboring types, but members of the Harmonic groups are never neighbors so this can group can be a great tie-breaker between two neighbors. (Your character can still incorporate attributes of the neighboring type as a Wing. More below.)
There are also certain defining, almost signature, characteristics unique to each type. Don’t ignore first impressions. If you notice one of these in your character, consider that type.
Ones have an Inner Critic. They are especially hard on themselves and can’t stand to make a mistake, even a small one that anyone else could shrug off.
Twos are Empathetic with others. They want to be busy and always look to the needs of others to see what they can do.
Threes believe they are their Achievements. They are natural charmers and great with people, able to get on with anyone to achieve their goals.
Fours nurture a Fantasy Self. They live through imagined futures, enjoying every nuance of their emotion, which they experience at the slightest provocation.
Fives have a Personal Battery. They are highly conscious of the limits of their energy, and avoid socialization not because they don’t enjoy friendships, but simply because it leaves them drained and they need solitude to recharge.
Sixes have an Inner Committee. They are filled with self-doubt, and their minds are constantly running a commentary of what friends and family might say or advise.
Sevens live for Freedom. They love to have fun and are always seeking excitement and chasing their dreams.
Eights have a Big Presence. They always want to be in control of the situation and they usually are.
Nines are often Chameleons, able to change themselves to suit those around them and find an unassuming role to fill.
Typing a character solely off of these defining characteristics can be misleading, as a matter of fact they can be the very things we use to mistype ourselves or others. However, they are a great starting place to try out an enneatype and see how it fits.
So, You’ve Found Your Character’s Type…
Once you have decided on the type best suited to your character, there are several ways you can “check your work” to see if that type holds true.
Stress and Security Points
Look at the Stress and Security points of your character’s type. Does this type react under stress as your character does in the story? This means, when under stress in the internal conflict, facing intensified fears and more distanced from wants, does your character take on some of the behaviors of the stress type (particularly those defined by the Hornevian groups) when he has exhausted his base type’s tactics? This can be a brief moment, but is usually a time of desperation or collapse for your character and will often make his problems worse.
At stressful points in you character’s story, when he has pushed the limits of his type’s strategies as far as they will go and still not achieved his goal, he will either slip down a notch on the Level of Development (usually only an acute trauma will cause this, more below) or adapt to take on some of the behaviors of his Stress type. This is an unconscious reaction rather than a calculated change of strategy and usually happens after long time of chronic stress.
The character does not “turn into” another type. A person’s base type never changes, so their fears, motives and wants remain the same. A Two, for instance, reacting to stress and shifting to Eight behaviors does not suddenly want autonomy instead of attention, but is changing tactics and becoming more aggressive and assertive in their attentions to others in an attempt to force others to appreciate them. Usually, these stress tactics fail, but sometimes under mild stress they will work often enough to establish the habit.
The change in your character will be more obvious to others around him than to himself. It might make others ask him something like, “What’s gotten into you?”.
Consider your character’s reactions concerning the Security point as well. Types not only move to the Security point during times of safety or personal growth but may move there under times of stress when around trusted people. This brings great diversity to your character’s reactions and makes his relationships feel more real. Moving to the Security point under stress will not bring in the best qualities of that type, but usually those found in the average or unhealthy range. This can also be great to use in the midpoint, when your protagonist is feeling low, but is trying to open up to other possibilities and ways of being.
Not all character’s types will be obvious if their full range of emotions and behaviors are not expressed. Try using the Enneagram to push your characters and see how you can use the story to get them to show the full gamut of their type. Explore having them spike to their Stress point over little things as well as heavy stress. Even when characters are under chronic stress and living in their Stress point, they can still have good days and moments of healthy behavior. Give them flashes of awareness through their Security point at such times as the midpoint. Even when a character has achieved their inner goals, they are not invincible to stress and negative thinking. They can still have bad days and maintaining the self they have worked for will still be an everyday effort. Consider this when planning sequels.
Finally, think about the climax and resolution of your story. What strengths will your protagonist need to evoke in order to be victorious in the final battle? If these are the best of the qualities from your chosen type’s Security point, this may be just the type your character needs to be to fit the story.
Levels of Development
For each type, there is a unique range of nine states your character can exhibit depending on how they are handling the hurdles of their type. This is indispensable for developing your character’s arc and understanding how he views himself relative to his world at various points along his journey. What is the lowest point (probably somewhere between the midpoint and the climax) he will reach in the story? Do the lower levels of your character’s type mirror this scene? What about the midpoint when he recognizes, if even for a moment, that this ladder to a better self exists? Only after this can he accept his inner journey and start climbing the rungs and by the end should reach the point of liberation, the top rung, level one.
As the Lie is gradually taken apart, its opposite, the Theme will come to light. But, depending on the type of character arc in your story, your protagonist may never accept this journey, never start climbing and will tragically fall to the bottom of the ladder and fail to resolve his inner conflict. He will continue to believe his Lie and never learn the lesson of the Theme that would have saved him from himself.
If you can’t help but think that some types are better than others, it’s probably because you’re impression of certain types are those types at their worst and other types at their best. All types can be good or bad, though it is true that some types tend to make their problems other people’s problems and some suffer alone, but all types can be the villain or the hero.
You might find that the types you thought were the best have the potential to go down the darkest paths and the types you thought had the most problems can become some of the most admirable people at their best. Most people spend most of their time in the average range, and this is probably where you want your protagonist to start at the open of the story. Also, think about how dark your characters could plausibly go within the context of your story. Not all character arcs need be so dire.
The Importance of the Wing
Consider the two wings of your chosen type. Does your character display some amount of these characteristics as well? Will the qualities of one wing in particular be useful to this character in his quest? Sometimes it can be helpful to choose a type based more on what two wings your character has and how they mix to create the base type. For example, even if your character doesn’t seem distinctively Fourish, but can preform for a crowd if need be and also seeks solitude to contemplate problems, you can accept that this character is a Four because of the expression of the Three and Five wings.
After you have confirmed the best type for your character, carefully consider the wing as well. Characters can be “pure” types but more likely they will have little variations that make them slightly different from others of their type. The wing is the most important in providing this augmentation and depending on which wing you choose, you might end up writing an entirely different story. For example, Gone With the Wind would have followed and entirely different course from beginning to end had Scarlett O’Hara been a Seven with a Six wing instead of a Seven with an Eight.
Choosing a wing outside of the base type’s Triad, can bring in variation to the type. At the same time, you might reinforce the flaws and strengths of the type by choosing the wing within the same Triad. The Triangle types (Three, Six and Nine) are unique in this way. Being centered in their Triads, both their wings must be of the same Triad. Because of this they tend to have the problems of their Triad reinforced in them, no matter which wing they have.
Whether this is true for real people or not, I’m not sure, but I’ve noticed among characters that one wing tends to be expressed externally, and the other wing internally. The external wing is considered the dominant wing, and is used as an additional shell of persona to protect the character from their fears. It may become stronger when the character is on their guard and then relax, exposing the base type when the character feels safe. The internal wing, however, works its way into the character’s thoughts to create an internal monologue. This may be things the character would tell himself when nobody is around and would only be shared with the most trusted of friends, and then only during a time of crisis.
For example, Scarlett O’Hara and George Bailey are both Sevens, Scarlett has an Eight wing and George has a Six wing, both expressed externally. Scarlett becomes more controlling and manipulative to protect herself and get what she wants, and George becomes more loyal and hardworking to secure his needs. Internally however, both of them have the recessive wing effecting their ways of thinking. Scarlett worries, imagines worst case scenarios and strategized like a Six. Only the denial tendencies of her Seven base type break this cycle of worrying. George, on the other hand, is plagued by the feeling that he has no control over his life, that he is trapped and had to let his life dreams die. Only reaching his Five security point allowed him to appreciate what he had in his life and let go of regret.
Here’s another theory about how wings may effect the character’s base type. It once occurred to me that the wing may have some effect on the Stress and Security points, perhaps causing them to shift slightly accordingly as well. After I quick search online, I found that others have noticed this as well. Picture the circle of the Enneagram not simply as a connect the dots of separate points, but as a gradient of all the types smoothing together. A personality can exist anywhere on the gradient and the arrows that indicate the Stress and Security points move with it as a fixed shape. For example a Six with Seven wing would no longer have Stress and Security points Three and Nine as a “pure” Six, but rather a Stress point Three with a Four wing and a Security point Nine with a One wing.
The Instinctual Variants
Separate yet integrated into enneatypes are the instinctual variants: self-preservation, social and sexual. Every character will be one of these in addition to their enneatype and even if you choose not to follow the Enneagram, it can be helpful to think of characters in these terms.
Instinctual variants stand independently from the types, but combined with them cause each to act in three slightly different ways creating the appearance of three subtypes. Because of these three instinctual variants as well as the nine enneatypes there are sometimes said to be twenty seven distinct personality types (Even more than that if you look at other personality sets aside from the Enneagram. The most I’ve seen is in the hundreds). However, I believe thinking in terms of twenty seven distinct types can make exploring the Enneagram more confusing (for the same reason that I prefer to break down the nine types into groups of threes instead).
My favorite and perhaps the easiest way to think about the Instinctual Variants is by imagining your character just walking into a crowded room, where some gathering is taking place, for instance. What will your character notice first?
Your character walks into a room and the first thing he notices is…
Self-Preservation
The temperature of the air is pleasant and it looks like there are lots of comfortable places to sit. Refreshments are on a table nearby and there are restrooms in the back as well as another exit apart from the door he just came in.
Social
The host is greeting guests and lots of people in the room are talking. Some people have noticed him and others have not. He quickly feels out the politics of the room and determines who to befriend to become accepted by the group.
Sexual
One person draws his attention. This person seems interesting and exciting and he wants to get closer to this person for no other reason than the emotion of the moment.
This upon-entering-a-room scenario is not the only way to define the Instinctual Variants. Self-Preservation types will also fret over matters of money and irregular mealtimes, anything concerning their comforts and survival as well as those of their family. Social types will want to see their efforts reflected in how others value them and will check in with others regularly to feel this sense of security. Sexual types are not particularly interested in intimacy any more than other types, but rather are the thrill-seekers of the three and need excitement and intensity to feel alive.
You can probably see already how these variants can temper or reinforce existing qualities in the various types. For example a Social Three will be even more interested in self image than a Self-Preservation Three. A Self-Preservation Five will be even more concerned with his ability to survive in the world and a Sexual Seven will be even more drawn to excitement and new experiences. You can use this to reinforce qualities that you feel should be strengthened or become signature in your character or use it to dampen down certain qualities that seem too strong or would contradict the story.
The Enneagram and the Writer
In exploring the Enneagram, we can hardly help but wonder about our own type. If you are curious, there are many test you can take to determine your type, or you may know already after having read about the types. Either way, it might be interesting to consider your own type when applying the Enneagram to your characters. It can make it much easier for you to think like your characters if you share their mindset, emotional motivations and methods of reacting to the world around them.
Should your protagonist share the same type as you? What about your antagonist? It might not be a bad thing to know your antagonist even better than your protagonist and it is always a good thing for your protagonist and antagonist to have something in common. Even if they are not the same type, they should at least both be members of the same group or the Stress and Security types of each other. Having your protagonist and antagonist share the same type can be a great way to give them those similarities that will fuel conflict between them and show them both to be two sides of the same coin. If this is your type as well, don’t be afraid to dig deep inside to explore the inner turmoil and need of your protagonist and the flaws and dark motivations of your antagonist.
It’s been my observation that the most popular and long remembered characters are those that have distinct enneatypes. Maybe this is because not only are they more complete and dynamic that way, but we can all identify with them because we share these common types.
My goal is for you to never have to pick up a template to write a complete and compelling character. I want you to be able to, at any time, conjure up an image of the Enneagram in your mind and find truths in it that you can use to apply to your characters. I want you to be able to type any character, know why you came to the conclusion you did, and discover things about that character that you wouldn’t have otherwise seen.
I hope this article will help you type your characters and maybe you will be glad to never see them in quite the same way again!
Every story’s plot comes down to the relationship between the protagonist and the antagonist. These two characters make the story, so whatever is tying them together in conflict has to be strong for both of them. The two must be marked by each other in some way. Even before the protagonist takes any action against the antagonist, no other character involved in the conflict could possibly take the lead role. He has already been singled out. The same goes for the antagonist. No other force could possibly undo the protagonist in the same way as the antagonist can.
Don’t leave this task to the external conflict alone. Logical reasons explaining why each character can’t turn away are vital. However, the plot can only be emotional if something in the internal conflict compels them to battle. The best way to do this is to give both characters something in common.
Already, your protagonist and antagonist probably have one thing in common. They must be in conflict over the Want, or there is no story. Either they are both after the same thing, or one wants something that the other cannot allow. Even so, the relationship can never be more than Hero vs Villain unless they share more points of internal conflict. The protagonist and antagonist must be tailored to suit each other. This will make each of them the particular opponent for the other, each the only one that is truly dangerous to the other.
Shared Points of Internal Conflict
There is nothing more deeply disturbing to the protagonist than to recognize something of the enemy in himself. Not only does he then questions his motives and actions, but a possible “wrong path” comes to light showing what he could become.
Explore these possible connections between protagonist and antagonist through the points of the Internal Conflict Triangle.
Wound
Shared traumatic backstory is the strongest tie between protagonist and antagonist. Voldemort killed Harry’s parents. The Emperor turned Luke’s father into Darth Vader. Katniss’s father was killed because of the way of life inflicted by President Snow. Most Man Vs. Nature stories start out with a prologue showing the protagonist loosing a loved one to the type of natural disaster they become obsessed with. Every time the protagonist faces the antagonist, not only is there the threat of physical danger, but the reopening this past Wound.
Fear
Before the protagonist realizes the weakness of his own Fear, it is often discovered and exploited first by the antagonist. It takes the protagonist longer yet to discover the same weakness in the antagonist, and having the same fear himself can make it harder for him to use it.
Don’t forget that the antagonist has an internal conflict as well. Understanding it is the best way, for your protagonist and for you as the writer, to find out his weaknesses.
Lie
A protagonist that shares a Lie with the antagonist is in greatest danger of going down the wrong path. He will be his own worst enemy, and unless he recognizes this Lie for what it is, he can never have a happy ending. The antagonist may be the one to bring this shared Lie to light, using it to shake up the protagonist in telling him that they are not so unalike as he would like to think. This sort of event can easily lead to the Midpoint and a “mirror moment” (as taught by James Scott Bell) where the protagonist reevaluates where he stands in his internal conflict.
Flaw
The protagonist may be most blind to this kind of similarity with the antagonist, though it will likely be what he hates the most about him. It might take the intervention of another character, a friend or mentor, to make him see this. (Well suited to the “ally attacks” plot point employed by Libby Hawker.)
Want
As I’ve mentioned above, this connection will always be present as it is the strongest link between the internal and external conflicts. Why the characters are after this goal is explained mostly by the Wound and Fear points of internal conflict, the Motivation corner of the Triangle.
Need
The antagonist is potentially the best teacher for the protagonist if they share this connection. By learning about the antagonist, he can learn about himself and see what’s really important and what he needs to do to overcome the same obstacles that were the downfall of the antagonist. At the same time, struggling through his own internal conflict may shed light on solutions in the external conflict in how to best defeat the antagonist.
Bring in the External Conflict
The protagonist’s inner journey is triggered by the introduction of the antagonist and the external conflict. The struggles of overcoming both of these conflicts, the places where they intersect, will form the central conflict. Each time the stakes are raised, there will be an additional push of stress on both. The protagonist’s usual way of dealing with problems won’t work against the antagonist. These methods were probably effective in the past, which is why they became entrenched, but when faced with the antagonist, they become a vulnerability. Only through the inner journey can they be reformed and brought to the external conflict as a strength.
The antagonist is not just the story’s bad guy, he is the protagonist’s bad guy. If the antagonist does not strike a nerve in the protagonist, they are not well matched and there is no central conflict. This is why an antagonist must suit the protagonist; just any scary villain won’t do. Their connection must be personal. This will make the effects of the protagonist’s Wound deadly. He must reopen and heal his Wound if he is to survive the conflict with the antagonist, but at the same time, perhaps nothing less could have brought him to do this.
However you choose to develop your characters, they have to fit your story and they have to fit together. No two characters are more important in this way than the protagonist and the antagonist. These two characters are more alike than you think, certainly more alike than they would care to admit.
Internal conflict is the most important part of any story and it is often the most easily overlooked by beginning writers. External conflict is easy to brainstorm, easy to see and most premises (except for literary fiction) revolve around the external conflict rather than the internal conflict. When you hear the advice, “story is all about the characters” this is what it’s talking about. There has to be internal conflict, or the story lacks meaning and it doesn’t impact the reader.
The Internal Conflict Triangle
All writers have heard the term “character sketch” but rarely have I heard anyone talk about “character structure”. Character’s wants, needs, strengths and weaknesses are all familiar enough, but they don’t imply any intrinsic structure on their own. How do these pieces come together to form a character?
Two books I read really brought the skeleton of my first Internal Conflict Triangle together. The first one was Take Your Pants Off by Libby Hawker (no need for offense! This is a pun referring to writers who are pantsers rather than plotters) and Writing the Heart of Your Story by C.S. Lakin.
Libby Hawker talks about basing a character on a Flaw, one that will need to be addressed if the character is to grow and solve the conflict. This hurdle creates the character arc of journeying from the “flawed” state into the “true self”, which is all about the Need to learn a lesson. C.S. Lakin talks about a character suffering a Wound which causes a Fear and the belief in a Lie which become obstacles to achieving a core Need. The Need and Fear are linked. Fear is that Need won’t be realized and Need is to overcome Fear. She also talks about the character’s journey from “persona” to “true essence” (which is the way to look at character arc from the point of view of the Enneagram as well).
So at this point, we have these two templates:
A Flaw gives rise to a character’s Need to overcome that Flaw and achieve a better self.
A Wound causes a Fear that Need will not be met and a belief in a Lie that Need cannot be met
Each of these formalize what makes up the inside of a character, but I thought each method was not quite as universal as it could be. Then I realized the two could be very easily combined to make an even more complete picture. These points were all just different ways of looking at the same roots of character and in every character, all of them are present to some extent.
Wound
This is the true start of your character’s story. If the antagonist’s actions are the Inciting Incident of the External Conflict (or Plot), then so the Wound is for the Internal Conflict. This event may happen at the beginning of your narrative, but more than likely it’s in the backstory and the audience will have to learn of it in bits and pieces. Or it could be shown through a prologue as often happens in movies where we are shown the protagonist surviving some traumatic event which explains their unique motivation throughout the story.
It’s worth considering which came first: the Wound or the Fear? Could definitely be a bit of both, but I would argue that at the very root, Fear has to come first. Two characters could share the exact same backstory but, because of their own unique Fears, come away from it with different Wounds. Each of them would have been wounded wherever the event hit their Fear. Fear is the weakness, and without it the character would have been immune to such Wounds. The “weapon” that caused the Wound isn’t so important as how the character has taken the injury and let it scar over.
Depending on the severity of the Wound, the Fear will be even more deeply entrenched. It’s ironic, considering the Fear was the weakness that allowed the Wound to happen in the first place. Think of this law of physics: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The character’s Fear will become more “irrational” and motivating depending on how severely the Wound event evoked this Fear. This force will carry on even further into the expression of the Flaw.
Don’t get the idea that every character must have survived some spectacular trauma. The Wound event could have been something that no one else even noticed but meant a great deal to the character. Or even something that can’t be defined by a single event, like an upbringing. If this is the case, there should still be some specific moment for the character that can be used to represent this past as a whole
Fear
Even though the story starts out with the Wound, the character started with the Fear. Very early on in life, the character felt something lacking inside which led to a Fear that the true self did not possess inner strength in this area. Since this hole could not be filled, it was quickly covered over with a protective mask of persona.
The character’s Driving Force is a two-sided coin with Want on one side and Fear on the other. Fear is much more powerful and provides the negative Motivation as opposed to the somewhat weaker positive Incentive of the Want. At the beginning of your story, your character will probably be more aware of their Want than their Fear, but each time the stakes are raised, they’ll find themselves running from their Fear much more than running towards their Want.
It’s important that the Fear be unique to this character (with the possible exception of the antagonist), even if it is something that anyone might try to avoid, to this character it may as well be a matter of life and death. That sort of Fear always revolves around some form of “death”, as James Scott Bell has said, either physical, professional or psychological death. Fear of real death is understandable, but what about the other two? It comes down to a Death of Identity. Whatever the character has been before the story started is at stake but also must change in order for the character to survive. This creates the conflict: The character must face the Death of Identity they Fear in order to survive and achieve their Need.
As I mentioned above, the Fear unique to your character will essentially act like an “irrational” fear. The idea of this thing happening is so unthinkable that the character will be in danger of responding completely irrationally in order to avoid it. This leads to the very common horror of characters, through their own Flaw which was developed as a defensive mechanism, causing their own Fear to become a reality. Realizing this contradiction is nearly unbearable in any internal conflict and is the make or break point in the character arc.
Lie
Many parts of the Triangle come into play here. The Lie is the justification of the Flaw, the belief that Fear is worth avoiding at all costs, that Wound cannot be healed or lived with or that Want will solve all problems. This self-message can make it easier to pursue Want as an excuse for avoiding Need. The character may tell themselves they’re not happy about having this Flaw, but for the moment they have no choice! Once they’ve achieved their Want, then they can let go of Flaw because they will be protected from their Fear. Depending on the story you’re writing, the specific Lie may take many of these forms or it might take just one.
Psychologically, Lies are not only believed because of past “evidence” from the Wound to support them, but because they subconsciously provide an excuse to avoid the real problem. Solving life problems requires painful self-examination, forgiveness and sacrifice. It’s hard. But believing the Lie does not really make life easier, it comes with a price. “It’s not your fault, it’s their fault” is a Lie that allows you to deny you can solve the problem and therefore absolves you of responsibility, but it also leaves you hopeless. This is the part that’s self-destructive. If there’s nothing you can do, you’re trapped to live out your life this way. This creates inner turmoil and the irrational response to Fear I mentioned earlier.
This “Master Lie” can also bring about smaller lies throughout the story. Whenever your character justifies some action, it could be a baby lie based on the Lie
Flaw
The Flaw is most tightly tied to Fear and Lie. Lie is the justification and Fear is the motivation. It’s used to pursue the Want (compare with Hornevian styles of Enneagram theory), and before the story began, it had been effective in protecting the character from Fear and obtaining wants. This was perhaps the worst thing that ever happened to the character. The more this Flaw has worked in the past, the harder it will be for your character to let it go and face the Fear without it. Instead the character may try harder to use it, only to push his Want further away. If your character can’t come to terms with this, he will end up destroying himself.
When faced with the antagonist, this Flaw will be ineffective and perhaps even revealed to be the self-destructive behavior that it is. The antagonist and protagonist need to have something in common in their Triangles (apart from the Want, which is a tie in External Conflict) and this very often is the Flaw. The antagonist can exploit it in the protagonist, and the protagonist might see this Flaw for what it is when reflected in the antagonist. Such a moment is a slap of reality for your character that can never be undone.
After this point, Flaw can truly be addressed and real strength will be allowed to take its place. A Flaw can also be seen as a sort of weakness and like any character weakness, it’s very satisfying when it can be turned around to serve as a strength. This also comes back to the idea of the character journeying from a “flawed” state to a “healed” state in Enneagram theory.
Want
A character has a Want. This is always the start of every story and the thing that hooks us at the beginning. We wonder, will the character obtain this Want? Reasons for the Want should be a mix of logical and emotional. Logical motives could be those anyone might use or relate to. Wanting money, fame, respect or love don’t really need explanation, but the unique emotional motives of this character is what really makes the story. What is this character missing that makes them want this thing?
This feeling of lack deep in the character, protected by Flaw and all other elements of the persona, is what subconsciously drives the Want. It also is what Needs to be filled with true inner strength, not simply patched with the Want. All the same, the Want can still be a reward for achieving the Need of inner growth once the emotional motives have been challenged.
The strongest emotional motive will be the Fear, but this might not be obvious to the audience or even the character at first. Learning why the character has this Want allows us to understand him and share the emotional stake in the story’s outcome. If there are no emotional motives for the Want, it’s too easy to ask why the character doesn’t turn back when the stakes get too high. There may also be logical reasons why the character is trapped in the conflict, but if there are no emotional motives as well, there is no internal conflict and this character is not central to this story.
We don’t realize at the beginning that the Want is a way of avoiding the Need. The character’s Need must be met if he is to achieve the Want or if he does achieve the Want first, he will realize that it is no help to his deep inner lack after all and must instead turn to his Need.
Need
All the points of the Triangle come together here. The character Needs to face his Fear, overcome his Flaw, realize his Lies for what they are, and heal the reopened Wound. This is the most thematic point of the Triangle. It will come down to not only healing the Wound, but realizing inner growth that will make the character immune to future such wounds. The character will let go of past identity and realize the true self. Whether the Want was achieved or not, the Need is a must for a happy ending and might turn out to bring greater rewards than the sought after Want ever could.
The Development of the Triangle
My Internal Conflict Triangle has gone through a few revisions, and I don’t doubt it might go through a few more in the future. The elements have never changed but their relationships have shifted. For one thing, you might be wondering why I call it a Triangle when it technically has six points, even though they are arranged in pairs. Well, originally I was viewing these pairs as two sides of the same coin, especially Fear and Flaw. To Fear is a Flaw, and a Flaw is a manifestation of a deeply rooted Fear. Wound is the event and Lie is the rationalization of that event, the false lesson learned from it. Need and Want are still in the same pair for obvious reasons. They are both goals, one the character goes after, the other is the true reward in a happy ending.
First incarnation of the Internal Conflict Triangle.
The most important change, I think, is the movement of Fear further and further back into the roots of the Triangle. At first, Fear shared a point with Flaw as I saw them as both problems of the present the character has to deal with. But then I realized the Lie is more on the same level with Flaw than Fear. Flaw and Lie are both set ways of being that evolve from a past. Lie is the thought and Flaw is the action. Fear on the other hand, is much more closely linked to Wound, either it is caused by the Wound, or as I think now, it is the very root of every character that needs to grow. Character arc is about realizing the Fear holds no true power, and that you always had it within to become immune to the Wound.
The importance of the order of events occurred to me when I made these changes. It matters what comes first because it shows what is at the core of character. Over the course of a story, the shells of protection need to be peeled off in the order in which they were established to get to this raw nerve where the Wound remains unhealed. Though the Wound is not the true core, it is the way we can see the effects of the Fear. This is the essence of Show don’t Tell. When we can see the character has come to terms with the past and is no longer troubled by the Wound, we know the Fear is conquered because it was only Fear that allowed the Wound to occur in the first place.
It’s not unlike the idea in mystery writing that every story actually has two stories: the true order of events in backstory, and the order in which we experience them in the narrative itself. The journey of Internal Conflict can be thought of as sleuthing out the true source of problems in the character’s life
Other Ways of Viewing the Triangle
This somewhat free-floating form of character structure can also be viewed in a more linear way. If you broke the line of the Triangle between Wound and Need and stretched it out into a line, you would have a linear representation of story arc, a Character Timeline. Wound and Fear are Backstory, in the past, Flaw and Lie are the character’s present state, and the Want and Need are the goals for the future. (The label of “motivation” for the present worked better before I switched Lie and Fear around in the Triangle.)
Ignoring the lines and looking at the Triangle as a circle or a wheel, you can see how the points directly across from each other are related. The Fear and Want are the Driving Force of the story, the Motivation and Incentive. The Lie and Need bring in the Theme, the Lie being a sort of anti-theme and the Need the realization of the theme’s lessons. Finally the Wound and Flaw have to do with the reader’s perception of the character. The Flaw can make the character unlikable yet relatable and the Wound gives us sympathy and deeper understanding. We’re no longer so quick to judge and we wonder what we ourselves might do in the same circumstances.
This Internal Conflict Triangle is certainly not the only way to look at the makeup of characters or character arcs, but I hope it is as universal as any such sketch could be. Try it out and don’t be afraid to explore any changes that could more closely apply to your own characters. I’d love to hear what you think!